Number 1! If you picked 2 or 3, don't feel bad; at least parts of their story are plausible. I, however, have a strict policy that injuries sustained in a multi-tiered and complicated fashion are automatically suspect if they involve animals. I try not to be sucked in by smoke and mirrors, drama, weeping and wailing, and drama. Did I mention drama?
And just to put your mind at ease, no animals were harmed in the fabrication of the injuries of numbers 2 and 3.
3 comments:
I should have been tipped off by the presence of a visible injury. Did number 2 at least get some percocet for his creativity?
Yeah. Score one for the nursing home nurse ;-)
@Hoodnurse: well, no. He had been seen for variations of the Holy Trinity of Pain Complaints before. He was offered Toradol. The laceration required no sutures. And the doc was Mac, who is allergic to dispensing narcotics
@NurseJannie: Good job!
Post a Comment